| Web 1.0 | Web 2.0 | |
| DoubleClick | > | GoogleAdsense |
| Ofoto | > | Flickr |
| Akamai | > | BitTorrent |
| mp3.com | > | Napster |
| Britannica Online | > | Wikipedia |
| personal websites | > | blogging |
| evite | > | upcoming.org and EVDB |
| domain name speculation | > | search engine optimization |
| page views | > | cost per click |
| screen scraping | > | web services |
| publishing | > | participation |
| content mgmt systems | > | wikis |
| directories (taxonomy) | > | tagging ("folksonomy") |
| stickiness | > | syndication |
Additionally, O'Reilly, writing a 2005 article titled "What is Web 2.0," explored seven principal features (1. The Web as Platform; 2. Harnessing Collective Intelligence; 3. Data as the Next Intel Inside; 4. End of the Software Release Cycle; 5. Lightweight Programming Models; 6. Software Above the Level of a Single Device; and 7. Rich User Experiences) that he considers core competencies of Web 2.0. Upon initial research, O'Reilly's seven principles appear to be a logical organization for exploring Web 2.0.
2 comments:
AB, great idea to write a blog on this. If I understand correctly, you are writing that the difference between Web 1.0 and 2.0 is the level of collaboration allowed. Web 1.0 was static, whereas Web 2.0 is dynamic. Is that right? Also, I noticed that your chart listing the differences cut off some letters....what is EV? I assume that Optimi should be optimization.
You are absolutely correct. As I understand it - and I'm a newbie t this, the main difference is the dynamic nature of creating, modifying, and overall interacting with web content. Sorry that my chart was cut off... "EV" is EVDB, and yes that should read optimization.
Post a Comment